Feed on
Posts
Comments

It’s not often that I feel compelled to write about current events, but this one hits particularly close to home.

Boeing Loses Out

Basically, the US Air Force has awarded its $40B contract to a company that is affiliated with the European plane maker AirBus. For shame. What have we come to in the country when we are practically outsourcing our national defense? Granted, the company that was awarded the contract, Northrop Grumman, has agreed to build a manufacturing plant for the tankers in Mobile, Alabama. But the frames they use are manufactured by AirBus, in plants outside the US. Not only that, but how much defense information will they potentially share with foreign companies? And shouldn’t a certain degree of national solidarity outweigh any differences in budgets? Can you imagine the uproar if our police and public servants began driving nothing but Toyotas and Hondas simply because they were cheaper?

Obviously, I have a personal interest in the situation. My father has worked for Boeing for 31 years. Our family has tightened belts through strikes, crossed our fingers through each period of layoffs, put aside our personal needs when he works 14 days in a row, but everything has come out right in the end. I am proud of the contributions my father makes to the largest exporter in the US, a company that is one of the components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. To our family, and any other American manufacturer, this news is like a slap in the face.

Despite all this, it is sometimes hard to reconcile how it feels to be a part of the company that simultaneously builds machines which bring people together and also wage war. I have to remind myself often that machines are only tools, and the purpose to which they are used is decided by humans.  I would be happier if the company my father worked for only made airplanes for commercial purposes, but even I can recognize that a peaceful world without the need for standing armies is a utopian dream probably beyond human grasp.

To Mr. Obama…

Congratulations. Let’s hope this is the beginning of a trend.

Writing

I’ve come to the conclusion that writing is like the ancient Roman tradition of exposing a child. You give birth to this thing, which seems monstrous to you, and are horrified. Then you sort of abandon it on a mountaintop (or blog, editor’s desk, professor’s desk) and one part of you hopes no one ever sees the hideous offspring and that it dies peacefully, but the other part of you hopes that perhaps its not as malformed as you think. Perhaps some poor shepherd will take pity on it and rescue it from a quiet, lonely death. Then again, perhaps it will return to kill you, marry its mother, and destroy your way of life as you know it.

On second thought, writing is much more like kittens. Warm, fuzzy kittens.

Awesome.

If only Christians were willing to understand how ridiculous they sound. Like this: Convert Yourself

And this really great editorial piece in the NY Times…I wish every fundy right winger who had an opinion about gay marriage or prayer in schools or the ‘Founding Fathers’ would read this: A Nation Of Christians Is Not A Christian Nation

I know its not very tolerant of me, and overall I don’t mind Christians…the normal ones. Even if I do think they are all a bunch of lunatics, usually they are harmless. It’s just a few extremists that have to ruin it for the rest of the bunch.

First, feminism. There is plenty to be said about the idea of a fight club exclusively for men, and the fact that in Palahniuk’s book men feel the need to fight back against the emasculation forced upon them by “excessive feminism.” Which is a bit of an oxymoron in terminology anyways - ‘force’ and ‘feminism’, considering that being forceful is not a typical trait assigned to women in most cultures.

But let’s begin by examining the few female characters available to us, Marla and Chloe. The interesting thing about Marla, and Chloe to some degree, is that they are two of the characters which we get the most physical description about. On page 18, the narrator describes Marla for us - “Short matte black hair, big eyes the way they are in Japanese animation, skim milk thin, buttermilk sallow in her dress with a wallpaper pattern of roses…” Again, on pg. 36 the narrator talks about her “black hair and pillowy French lips…Italian dark leather sofa lips.” Why is it that Marla gets so much attention devoted to her looks, more so than any other character in this novel? Because we have the propagation that women are defined by their appearance. Neither the narrator nor Tyler appear to really like Marla at first, but it is not difficult for us to believe that they would sleep with her because she is initially created as a sensual character. In juxtaposition to this we have Chloe, a woman who seems to garner a great deal of respect from the narrator, perhaps a genuine degree of affection, and yet she cannot be seen as an individual worth initiating a relationship with simply because of her appearance. pg 20 “Our Chloe, however, is a skeleton dipped in yellow wax.”

Another interesting aspect to the construction of Marla’s character is the repeated mention of her wearing dresses. On pg 18 we hear about her wallpaper patterned dress, pg 67 she describes her bridesmaid dress, on pg 93 there is distinct mention of her Indiaprint skirt. Granted, some women still prefer to wear dresses but in today’s times it is far less common without a religious or cultural motivation. Why does Palahniuk feel the need to paint such a stereotypical picture of a modern woman?

Even with all her other hang-ups about life and society, Marla cannot seem to escape the obsession with youth and beauty that is pushed upon women in society today. She remarks on pg 91 that she is keeping the collagen from her mother in case of old age, the fear that it will rob her of her “Paris lips.” Also Marla and her mother relate best through the context of beauty - hence the continuous gifts of collagen from Marla’s mother, and that the only real contact they seem to engage in, via telegram, is appropriated by Tyler to read “Hideously Wrinkled - Please Help” (pg 89) which her mother finds nothing strange about.

Interestingly, although the men in Fight Club say that they are reclaiming their masculinity from an effeminate society that has robbed them, a society that has reduced gender roles to cookie-cutter dimensions, the narrator creates a character like Tyler. Confrontational, engaging in relationships purely for sexual motivation, the culturally-accepted stereotype of what it means to be a ‘man’ - merely bouncing from one preconceived notion to another.At the point in the book where we may imagine that Marla began to fight back against Tyler, to revolt against his imposed rules upon her of asking no questions and asserting herself after witnessing his commit a murder, Tyler reacts in a very stereotypically masculine way as well. On pg 195 - “‘You can suck shit’ Marla says and pushes her punched-out black eye at me. ’Just because you and your little disciples like getting beat up, you touch me ever again, and you’re dead.’” His inability to deal with a woman that doesn’t fit his ideal of obedience results in her physical punishment.

In regards to lesbian/gay theory, this story is ripe with innuendo that can be plucked out. Perhaps the biggest is the idea of moving into a home with a man you met on a nude beach – definitely not typical behavior. For many men, they would never even initiate a conversation with another man if he were naked while in a public place where women could also be. Perhaps it would be more acceptable in a locker room or gym, but not in a public area. 

Also, the branding of the disciples themselves. Earlier I talk about how much emphasis is given to Marla and her lips. This is carried out with the narrator and Tyler as well. Tylerbrands the narrator with a kiss, a burn that shows up as “swollen red and glossy as a pair of lips.” (pgs 77, 85) The purpose of lipstick for a woman is to draw attention to the lips, because swollen, red lips are a physiological sign of sexual arousal. What does this say that the narrator describes his brand as such, or that Tyler chooses such a means to mark his disciples instead of something more benign? 

Older Posts »